CASE REPORT  
Niger J Paed 2013; 40 (4): 419 – 421  
Eseigbe EE  
Eseigbe P  
Nuhu FT  
Sheikh TL  
Majebi MA  
Kalu AO  
Impact of childhood mental health  
disorders on the family: A Case  
report  
Lasisi MD  
Suleiman ZT  
Sadiq EI  
Banjo OO  
Adebayo O  
DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/njp.v40i4,14  
Accepted: 6th March 2013  
Abstract Background: Care of  
the children with mental health  
disorders is fraught with chal-  
lenges particularly in developing  
countries and, where the family is  
the major source of care. Conse-  
quently assessing the impact of  
these disorders on the family is  
relevant to providing these chil-  
dren with optimal care.  
dysfunctional family) and the ZBI  
Scores high (highly burdened) in  
the family. Areas of serious dys-  
function in the family were in ad-  
aptation, partnership and growth.  
In the ZBI Scores feelings about  
quality and cost of care offered,  
stress and other negative attributes  
associated with providing care,  
inability to meet other parental  
obligations and uncertainty about  
the future, were the major con-  
tributors to the highly burdensome  
outcome.  
(
)
Eseigbe EE  
Department of Paediatrics  
Eseigbe P,  
Department of Family Medicine  
Ahmadu Bello University Teaching  
Hospital, Zaria Nigeria.  
Email: eeeseigbe@yahoo.com  
Nuhu FT, Sheikh TL, Majebi MA  
Kalu AO, Lasisi MD, Suleiman ZT  
Sadiq EI, Banjo OO, Adebayo O  
Federal Neuro –Psychiatric Hospital,  
Kaduna, Nigeria.  
Objective: To assess the impact of  
childhood mental health disorders  
on family function and parental  
burden.  
Method: A monogamous family  
that had 3 children diagnosed as  
having childhood onset schizo-  
phrenia using the International  
Classification of Disease version  
Conclusion: The study highlights  
significant family burden and dys-  
function in a family who had three  
children with schizophrenia. It  
underscored the need for provision  
of more comprehensive health and  
social support services to children  
with mental health disorders and  
their families.  
1
0(ICD 10) Classification was  
studied. Family function was as-  
sessed using the Family APGAR  
Score and the Zarit Burden Inter-  
view (ZBI) Score used in assess-  
ing parental burden.  
Key Words: Childhood, Schizo-  
phrenia, Parent, Burden, Family  
function  
Results: The Family APGAR  
Scores were low (highly  
Introduction  
available or not accessible in low and middle income  
countries. In response to this the World Health Organi-  
1
Globally an estimated 20% of children and adolescents  
suffer from mental disorders. Prevalence rates of 15-  
zation developed the Mental Health Gap Action Pro-  
gramme (mhGAP) for countries especially with low  
and middle incomes for scaling up services 1for mental,  
neurological and substance use disorders. Notwith-  
standing, the family still plays an important role in the  
provision of care in countries where mental health ser-  
vices are deficient.  
1
2
0% for childhood mental disorders have been reported  
2
from specific child populations in Nigeria. Parental  
psychopathology, in addition to low socio economic  
status and exposure to physical violence, has been re-  
ported to be stron,4gly associated with childhood mental  
3
health disorders. In spite of the magnitude of the prob-  
lem childhood mental health services are either not  
Assessing how the family and its members cope with  
4
20  
these disorders is crucial to provision of optimal care in  
these countries. The Family APGAR Score and the Zarit  
Burden Interview (ZBI) Score are two instruments that,  
have been validated and found reliable, are useful in the  
assessment5,o6 f family function and caregiver burden re-  
spectively.  
partnership and growth while scores of 1 and 2 were  
recorded in affection and resolve respectively.  
Concerning the ZBI Scores the mother had a higher  
mean score (80), though not significant (P=0.12), than  
the father’s (79.7±0.6). The areas associated with high  
burdensome scores(3-4) by the parents were with re-  
gards to; quality and cost of care offered, stress and  
other negative attributes such as embarrassment associ-  
ated with providing care, inability to meet other parental  
obligations and uncertainty about the future.  
This is the first case, out of the 600 cases seen in the  
first year of the newly inaugurated child and adolescent  
mental health (CAMH) unit of the Federal Neuro Psy-  
chiatric Hospital Kaduna (FNPHK), of three siblings  
presenting with the same mental health disorder in a non  
consanguineous monogamous setting.  
Family therapy, in addition to management of schizo-  
phrenia, was instituted in the family.  
The aim of this study was to assess family function and  
parental burden in a family having three children with a  
mental health disorder.  
Discussion  
Case report  
The study showed high family dysfunction and parental  
burden in a family that had three children with child-  
hood onset schizophrenia. There has been a previous  
report on 11 cases of families having 5 to 11members  
affected by the disorder but this was in an ethnically  
This case report is about a monogamous family with  
four female children and three of the children, aged 12,  
1
5 and 17 years, diagnosed as having schizophrenia us-  
ing the International Classification of Diseases version  
7
7
1
0 (ICD 10) classification. Father is a 49 year clergy-  
isolated community with a history of endogamy. The  
man while mother a 44 year old petty trader with a his-  
tory of schizophrenia and receiving treatment in the  
same hospital. There was no history of the disorder in  
the extended family. The parents are the sole providers  
of care for their children with, occasional financial sup-  
port from well wishers. They have neither received nor  
are they aware of any form of governmental or institu-  
tional support.  
history of mental health disorder in the family supports  
the reported strong association between parent psycho-  
pathology and childhood mental health disorders. How-  
ever genetic studies would be required to provide further  
information. High caregiver burden, using the ZBI  
Score, have been reported in the provision of care for  
8
children and adolescents with mental health disorders.  
The number of children with the disorder in the family,  
maternal history of the disorder, the family’s socio eco-  
nomic status and insufficient family support would have  
contributed to the degree of burden felt. Furthermore the  
history of maternal schizophrenia coupled with a  
woman’s pivotal role in providing home care in the Af-  
rican setting could have contributed to the higher mean  
Family function and parental burden were assessed us-  
ing the Family APGAR and ZBI Scores respectively.  
The Family APGAR Score uses the family’s member  
perception of satisfaction to assess 5 dimensions of fam-  
ily functioning namely Adapt5ability, Partnership,  
Growth, Affection, and Resolve. Each parameter is  
assessed on a 3-point scale ranging from 0(hardly ever)  
to 2(almost always). The final grading is thus: 0-3  
9
ZBI Score in the mother. Family dysfunction, using  
Family APGAR Score, have been reported in families  
1
0
caring for members with a chronic debilitating illness.  
(
Highly dysfunctional family), 4-6(Moderately dysfunc-  
It would appear that a high level of parental burden cor-  
relates positively with family dysfunction but the popu-  
lation size of this study makes the observation inconclu-  
sive. However, it provides a basis for further research  
into this association in our environment.  
tional family) and 7-10(Highly functional family). The  
Family APGAR Score has been found valid and reliable.  
The mean of each parental Family APGAR Score for the  
children was used as an indicator score for assessing  
family dysfunction. The ZBI Score, whose test-retest  
reliability and face validity has been established in Nige-  
ria, is a 22-item self-report inventory that examines bur-  
den associated with functional/behavioural impairments  
and the home care situation. Each question is scored on  
a 5 point-scale ranging from never(0) to nearly always  
present(4). Total scores range from 0 (lowest burden) to  
8
Score for the children was used as the indicator score for  
assessing burden in this study.  
The impact of having highly burdened parents or a dys-  
functional family is far-reaching and adverse. The fam-  
ily could suffer communal isolation as a result of stig-  
matization or a breakdown as a result of a member or  
members abdicating their responsibilities. Coping par-  
ents could experience; less productivity, inability to  
meet other obligations and potentially incapacitating  
stress. The children could end up receiving suboptimal  
care, subjected to stigmatization as well, discriminated  
against, abused or neglected7,,1s1uffer deterioration in the  
clinical state and even death.  
6
8 (highest burden). The mean of each parental ZBI  
The parental Family APGAR Scores and their mean  
scores were the same for all children. Father’s and  
mother’s score for each child was 3(highly dysfunc-  
tional family). The parameters associated with the low-  
est possible score (0) in the family were in adaptability,  
Relieving parental burden and supporting affected fami-  
lies limit development of these consequences. Identifica-  
tion of susceptible families and their burdens, as has  
4
21  
been noted in this study, improving level of awareness,  
provision of supportive social and specialist health ser-  
vices, and active participation in relevant global initia-  
tives such as the Mental Health Gap Action Programme  
Conflict of interest: None  
Funding: None  
(
mhGAP) are some ameliorating measures.  
References  
9. Eseigbe EE, Anyiam JO, Wam-  
manda RD. Care of the Child with  
Special Health Care Needs: A  
Report on 2 Nigerian Children  
with Muscular Dystrophy. Ann  
Niger Med 2006; 2(2): 29-31  
1
.
World Health Organization (2008).  
Mental Health Gap Action Pro-  
gramme (mhGAP): Scaling up care  
for mental, neurological and sub-  
stance use disorders. whqlib-  
doc.who.int/publicaions/  
5. Smilkstein G. The Family AP-  
GAR: A proposal for family func-  
tion test and its use by physicians.  
J Fam Pract 1978; 6(6):1231-39  
6. Zarit SH, Reever KE, Bach-  
Peterson J. Relatives of the im-  
paired elderly: correlates of feeling  
of burden. Gerontologist 1980;  
20:649-55  
7. Lewis S, Escalona PR, Keith SJ.  
Phenomenology of schizophrenia.  
In Sadock BJ, Sadock VA, Ruiz P,  
eds. Kaplan’s and Sadock’s com-  
prehensive textbook of psychiatry,  
Philadelphia: Lippincott, Wil-  
liams&Wilkins, 2009:pp1433-51  
8. Dada MU, Okewole NO, Ogun OC,  
Bello-Mojeed MA. Factors associ-  
ated with caregiver burden in a  
child and adolescent psychiatric  
facility in Lagos, Nigeria: a de-  
scriptive cross sectional study.  
BMC Pediatr 2011; 11: 110 -  
10. Panganiban-Corales AT, Medina  
MF. Family resources study part 1:  
family resources, family function  
and caregiver strain in childhood  
cancer. Asia Pac Fam Med 2011;  
10(1):10-14  
2
008/978924596206_eng.pdf  
Accessed 30/10/12  
2
3
.
.
Gureje O, Omigbodun OO, Gater  
R, Acha RA, Ikuesan BA, Morris  
J. Psychiatric disorders in a pediat-  
ric primary care clinic. Br J Psych  
1
994; 165:527-30  
10. Arboleda-Florez J. Stigma and  
Discrimination: an overview.  
World Psychiatry 2005;(4:S1):8-  
10  
McLaughlin KA, Gadermann AM,  
Hwang I, Sampson NA, Al-  
Hamzawi A, Andrade LH et al.  
Parent psychopathology and off-  
spring mental disorders: results  
from the WHO World Mental  
Health Surveys. Br J Psych 2012;  
2
00(4):290-9  
4
.
Fatori D, Bordin IA, Curto BM , de  
Paula CS. Influence of psychoso-  
cial risk factors on the trajectory of  
mental health problems from child-  
hood to adolescence: a longitudinal  
study. BMC Psychiatry 2013,  
1
3:31 -31